We’re having this conversation somewhere
in the western Serengeti. The “first one” was that visit to the Okavango Delta,
in Botswana, and the fulfillment of Karen’s lifelong dream of going to Africa.
“This one” is the tourist safari to Tanzania, with stops in several national
parks, including the Tarangire, Ngorongoro Crater, and Serengeti. It’s also an
opportunity to spend somewhere around $25,000 so that I can stand, in silence,
re-living the past two million years of human evolution, on the rim of Olduvai
Gorge. In her childhood dream, Karen meets the Maasai; on John’s trip, she dances
with the Maasai women then goes into one of their houses with a man dressed in traditional
shúkà, but with a smart phone clipped to his waist. In her childhood dream, she
sees a lion, a real, live, lion, her birth sign; on John’s trip she sees
dozens, one of them close enough to touch, so close, in fact, that she can see his
bloody front paw and four really nice, bloated, ticks attached to his ear. She
resists the temptation to reach out the Land Cruiser window and pet it, but
back home, two weeks later she’s still talking about that possibility.
On the “first one,” she marvels at the
beauty of everything, especially the people she encounters, including that
small girl in Zambia’s Simoonga Village who took her hand the minute we walked
through the entrance, a gap in the living wall of giant Euphorbia tirucalli, known in American nurseries as the pencil
tree, and refused to let go through our entire visit, never speaking,
periodically digging around in her pocket for some kind of a snack—offered but
politely declined—and at the end of our walk, waving goodbye. We introduce
ourselves to some villagers, one of them named “Theresa.” My sister is named
Teresa, so I tell Theresa that I have a sister with her same name and ask if I
can take her picture; she smiles and says “yes.” Later, I send Theresa’s picture
to Teresa, who responds “she’s beautiful.” Back home, we go to a local nursery
where I buy Karen a specimen of Euphorbia
tirucalli, my solution the problem of being smart enough not to reach out
that window and pet the lion with ticks in his ear.
This chain of events is typical of those
experienced by a semi-educated tourist. The scientific name is part of the
deal; nearly a year later, in the middle of an American Great Plains winter,
Karen buys a traditional Christmas plant, Euphorbia
pulcherrima, the familiar poinsettia. Botanists put both of these plant
species, one native to Africa, the other to Mexico, in the same genus, Euphorbia, and in the family
Euphorbiaceae, a group that is widely distributed, especially in the tropics.
The family includes about 7,500 species, over 2000 of which are placed in the
genus Euphorbia. Karen notes the
scientific name and the origin of this poinsettia plant, manipulated by growers
for the express purpose of celebrating a religious holiday; after all, she’s
been married to a biologist for half a century, so scientific names are part of
the household conversation. In Tanzania, however, our driver, Prosper Haule,
breaks off a small Euphorbia tirucalli twig
and explains traditional medicine uses of the gummy white fluid oozing out. I
ask whether it really works to cure cancer; Prosper just smiles.
That single word, Euphorbia, also is used in the vernacular—“euphorbia”—by everyone
who cultivates houseplants seriously. A Google search, using the phrase “number
of commercial nurseries in the United States” produces 28,100,000 hits in half
a second. A lot of people love and care for their house plants as if they were
family members. The italics—Euphorbia—along
with what those italics signify, and the geographical information readily
available on Wikipedia, are what separate regular tourists from semi-educated
ones. Sorry; I wish the education issue, and the behavior it produces, could be
stated a little more gracefully, but it cannot. Even those other italicized
words—tirucalli and pulcherrima—known in the scientist’s
jargon as “specific epithets,” one African, one Mexican, stick in my mind. I
wonder what they mean, who chose them to designate a particular kind of Euphorbia, when that choice was made,
and whether molecular biologists have told us something about those plants that
makes their names invalid. I make a mental note to find out the answers to
those questions later, back home, when I have access to a real library.
“Euphorbia
candelabrum,” says Prosper. American tourists may be afraid of scientific
names, but our driver is not. We’ve stopped at an Arusha National Park rest
area. I take photographs of a truly gigantic, symmetrical, plant, towering
above the surrounding acacias. Why do I take pictures of plants when I’m really
interested in animals? That’s a good question, with only one answer, having to
do with academic politics at a large university out in the Great Plains of
America. One time, many years ago, some ornery people in my department decided
that the course I taught, and loved dearly—Introductory Zoology—was old
fashioned and needed to be replaced with a modern course, something named
Biodiversity. One of the ornery ones had written a textbook by that name—Biodiversity.
Evidently use of that book, declined by major publishers at the time, was part
of the stimulus for this petty academic politics scenario.
I lost the vote, but immediately
demanded to teach the spring semester of Biodiversity. Quickly thereafter, I
brought home a couple of microscopes then went out into our back yard, dug up
one of Karen’s geraniums, and started studying plants, an activity that I’d
purposely avoided for the first fifty years of my life. Now, twenty years
later, standing in Arusha National Park, I’m reviewing that whole part of my
professional career and wishing that I had been to Africa before tackling a
subject as open-ended, as vulnerable to subversion, as “biodiversity.” If I
could turn back the clock, with my present camera, I’d ask Prosper to stand
beside that E. candelabrum and
deliver an impromptu lecture which, later, I’d convert into a ten minute video
for my class of 250 first year students. His voice—deep, gentle, authoritarian,
and validating a fundamental interest in traditional biology in a way that I could
never do.
No comments:
Post a Comment