AN OPEN LETTER TO MY GOP FRIENDS ON THE SUBJECT OF ABORTION:
This proposal is based on the
premise that it’s irrational to demand that a public health problem be solved
but at the same time be adamantly opposed to the methods of solving it. The
public health problem in this case is one we know how to solve, namely, unwanted
pregnancy. The methods of solving it are readily available, safe, extensively
tested, and found to be effective, at least at the individual level. It’s a
well-known and widely-accepted fact that long-term effects of this particular
public health problem fall unequally on the sexes, with the female being
physically affected, subjected to potential medical complications, and
traditionally burdened with nearly two decades of direct responsibility for the
care, feeding, and education of another human being, whereas the male’s
participation in this responsibility is largely voluntary or, when involuntary,
limited to financial contribution. The main points are:
(1) Immediately enact a so-called “life tax” to provide for
public funding of “life services,” defined as prenatal health care, treatment
for medical conditions arising from pregnancy, and care, including medical
care, clothing, food, shelter, and both education and special education as
needed, for any infant born to a mother who would otherwise have chosen to
abort it. Life services would continue until the child is 18 years old.
(2) Establish residency requirements, for access to such
support, similar to those already established, for example, for tuition at
post-secondary institutions.
(3) Require DNA testing of mother, infant, and father (when
the father can be ascertained) when an infant is born to a mother who would
otherwise have aborted it. Costs of such testing would be paid by life tax
revenues. If necessary, use test results to identify the father. Require, by
law, the father to contribute half of the costs incurred in providing life
services to mother and infant, and provide for an 18-year lien on the father’s
earnings if necessary, with an extension to such time as the state is re-paid half
of the life services costs by the father. Include in this law a provision that
the father’s parents are liable for this contribution if the father is a minor.
(4) Immediately establish sex-education programs in all
public schools, the curriculum to include effective contraception. Withhold
certification from private schools that do not institute such a curriculum.
(5) Immediately provide birth control services for all
individuals who want them but are unable to afford them. Pay for these services
through the life tax. Services would include oral contraceptives, Plan B,
condoms, patches, injections, and all other forms of artificial birth control
to individuals over the age of 14. These services would be available in school
health centers.
(6) In the event that an infant born to a mother who would
otherwise have obtained an abortion requires long-term care or services due to
a congenital condition, then such care and services would be provided by the
state and funded by life tax revenues.
(7) In the event that pregnancy results from rape or incest,
the mother would receive a lifetime stipend for carrying the fetus to term and
the state would fund all services resulting from this birth, including
counseling, adoptive services, and treatment of any medical conditions,
including mental or emotional ones, resulting from the conception and delivery
of this infant. In the case of rape or incest, residency and means requirements
do not apply.
(8) The overall impact of this program, including life tax
and life services, will be reviewed every ten years by qualified consultants
from outside the state. Life tax will be adjusted annually to ensure revenues
adequate to support life services programs.
A rough estimate, based on the
widely available information on costs of rearing children in the United States
fall is about $500,000 per non-aborted fetus if you add in the overhead costs
of administering the above program. For example, Wisconsin reported 7,640
abortions in 2011; at that rate we’re looking at somewhere in the vicinity of $3.8 billion over the next 18-20
years to provide life services as part of Walker’s plan to deal with the
problem of unwanted pregnancy for a
single year. Alternatively, of course, that $3.8 billion would be paid by those who would have had an
elective abortion but could not because of the law or other de facto restrictions on reproductive
services, and that’s assuming that the individuals involved actually had the
resources to pay these bills.
We have, of course, not even started
to consider the social costs of unwanted pregnancy brought to term, and I’m not
sure there is any real way to calculate those costs so that the public in
general, and male legislators in particular, appreciate their impact on
society. We do know that social factors such as lack of education, poverty, and
crime are linked at least to some degree, and that “quality of life” factors
are important for the attraction of business to a particular region. So in
essence, the $3.8 billion
should probably be considered a conservative estimate of the overall impact of
unwanted pregnancy on the State of Wisconsin. Obviously there are 49 other
states with varying numbers of abortions performed annually, but I have not
calculated the overall national cost. C’mon, GOP, man up. Pass this tax and
unlike G. W. Bush and his Iraq war of choice, make the nation pay for your
personal beliefs and sexual politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment