Why God made Tapeworms
I hope that Friday Coffee is a digital version of the conversations, with and among students, I've heard in the past 20 years at various coffee houses. If you want to contribute, feel free!
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Excerpt from a draft of a book project
I am also writing this book
because of a conversation I had not long ago with an African gentleman. He was
a scientist at one of the nation’s premier universities and his wife, also of
African descent, was a local physician. We were at a social gathering held in
the home of a university scientist and his wife, a couple of staunch
conservatives hosting a houseful of liberals, but surviving, as well as
catering, the evening beautifully. Because only at the most mindless of social
occasions does conversation not eventually turn to politics, before long we
began to discuss the nation’s leadership and global current events.
“In my country,” said the African
gentleman, “the politicians do not want you to talk about them. They do not
want your attention focused on the misery in your own nation. Instead, they
want you to spend your time thinking about the rest of the world so that they
can be corrupt, and build their own wealth by stealing from the people, and
carry out their own personal vendettas, often destroying their nation in the
process, and the population will not be paying any attention.” His deep resonant and slightly accented voice
added to the authority of his words. He paused. “That is what they want.” He smiled in a very patient, tolerant, way. “So
we grow up knowing quite a bit about the rest of the world, not because we are
so interested in global affairs, but by default.”
Based on my experience with
educated foreigners, I would say he was correct about his own worldliness. I
have been in social settings with scientists from at least twenty different
nations—including some now considered terrorist states—over the past several
decades. All of these scientists are more cosmopolitan than my American
colleagues; most of them speak and read at least two languages comfortably and are
rarely if ever constrained by having Fox News as their only sources of
information. In fact, many of them get on the Internet and listen to newscasts
in German, French, and Chinese. I can promise you they’re not listening to Bill
O’Reilly.
“But in your country,” my African
acquaintance continued, “the politicians want you to be concerned with what
they are doing to make you happy and safe and rich, and with local problems
that seem very dramatic.” By “local
problems” he could easily have been talking about everything from the O. J. Simpson,
Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, and Casey Anthony trials to the disappearance
of a teenage girl in Aruba, the murder of children by their mother, the
Christmas murder of a child beauty queen, or a lawsuit over display of The Ten
Commandments—that is, the substance, the heart and soul, of American public
discourse, cable news, and, arguably, Americans’ vision of our legal and social
systems.
“So you grow up ignorant of the
rest of the world.” He took a sip of his vodka. “You are happy because your
leaders tell that they are not going to raise your taxes,” he continued, “but
your indebtedness grows daily.” He smiled. “And you are losing your economic
competitiveness because you are afraid of science.” He shook his head, looked
over at his wife, then turned back to me. “Why does this happen?” I couldn’t
answer; I was still stuck on his “ignorant of the rest of the world.”
(I strongly recommend INTELLIGENT DESIGNER: EVOLUTION FOR POLITICIANS on kindle, nook, smashwords, or as trade paperback from www.createspace.com/3698485)
Monday, April 15, 2013
Alan Simpson's comments on abortion laws
A Modest Proposal in
response to one of my Facebook friend’s commentary about former Republican
Senator Alan Simpson’s assertion that male elected representatives should not
vote on abortion laws. See:
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/03/29/alan-simpson-smacks-down-gop-for-violating-privacy-of-women/
John Janovy, Jr.
So here’s a modest proposal, based on the premise that it’s
irrational to demand that a public health problem be solved but at the same
time be adamantly opposed to the methods of solving it. The public health
problem in this case is one we know how to solve, namely, unwanted pregnancy.
The methods of solving it are readily available, safe, extensively tested, and
found to be effective, at least at the individual level. It’s a well-known and
widely-accepted fact that long-term effects of this particular public health
problem fall unequally on the sexes, with the female being physically affected,
subjected to potential medical complications, and traditionally burdened with
nearly two decades of direct responsibility for the care, feeding, and
education of another human being, whereas the male’s participation in this responsibility
is largely voluntary or, when involuntary, limited to financial contribution.
Because the large majority of state legislators are male and claim to
understand public policy, my modest proposal is perfectly capable of being
carried out at the state level, at least, and should be carried out in those
states imposing severe restrictions on elective abortions. The main points are:
(1)
Immediately enact a so-called “life tax” to provide for public funding of “life
services,” defined as prenatal health care, treatment for medical conditions
arising from pregnancy, and care, including medical care, clothing, food,
shelter, and both education and special education as needed, for any infant born
to a mother who would otherwise have chosen to abort it. Life services would
continue until the child is 18 years old.
(2) Establish
residency requirements, for access to such support, similar to those already
established, for example, for tuition at a state’s post-secondary institutions.
(3) Establish
a means test for access to such support. The federal government already has
established guidelines for access to other social services, and means testing
is already in place for Medicare premiums, so enacting such a test for “life
tax” services should be easy to accomplish.
(4) Require
DNA testing of mother, infant, and father (when the father can be ascertained)
when an infant is born to a mother who would otherwise have aborted it. Costs
of such testing would be paid by life tax revenues. If necessary, use test
results to identify the father. Require, by law, the father to contribute half
of the costs incurred in providing life services to mother and infant, and
provide for an 18-year lien on the father’s earnings if necessary, with an
extension to such time as the state is re-paid half of the life services costs
by the father. Include in this law a provision that the father’s parents are
liable for this contribution if the father is a minor.
(5) Immediately
establish sex-education programs in all public schools, the curriculum to
include effective contraception. Withhold certification from private schools
that do not institute such a curriculum.
(6)
Immediately provide birth control services for all individuals who want them
but are unable to afford them. Pay for these services through the life tax.
Services would include oral contraceptives, Plan B, condoms, patches,
injections, and all other forms of artificial birth control to individuals over
the age of 14. These services would be available in school health centers.
(7) In the
event that an infant born to a mother who would otherwise have obtained an
abortion requires long-term care or services due to a congenital condition,
then such care and services would be provided by the state and funded by life
tax revenues.
(8) In the
event that pregnancy results from rape or incest, the mother would receive a
lifetime stipend for carrying the fetus to term and the state would fund all
services resulting from this birth, including counseling, adoptive services,
and treatment of any medical conditions, including mental or emotional ones,
resulting from the conception and delivery of this infant. In the case of rape
or incest, residency and means requirements do not apply.
(10) The
overall impact of this program, including life tax and life services, will be
reviewed every ten years by qualified consultants from outside the state. Life
tax will be adjusted annually to ensure revenues adequate to support life services
programs.
I don’t know what the tax base is for North Dakota, but a
VERY rough estimate, based on the widely available information on costs of
rearing children in the United States, and North Dakota’s population, would
fall in the range of $500,000 per non-aborted fetus, if you add in the overhead
costs of administering the above program. North Dakota reported 1,290 abortions
in 2009, so we’re looking at somewhere in the vicinity of $645 billion over the next 18-20 years to provide life
services as part of this male legislative action to deal with the problem of
unwanted pregnancy. Alternatively, of course, that $645 billion would be paid by those who would have had an
elective abortion but could not because of the law or other de facto restrictions on reproductive
services, and that’s assuming that the individuals involved actually had the
resources to pay these bills.
We have, of course, not even started to consider the social
costs of unwanted pregnancy brought to term, and I’m not sure there is any real
way to calculate those costs so that the public in general, and male
legislators in particular, appreciate their impact on society. We do know that
social factors such as lack of education, poverty, and crime are linked at
least to some degree, and that “quality of life” factors are important for the
attraction of business to a particular region. So in essence, the $645 billion should probably be
considered a conservative estimate of the overall impact of unwanted pregnancy
on the State of North Dakota.
Cheers.
JJ
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Excerpt from INTELLIGENT DESIGNER: EVOLUTION FOR POLITICIANS
But if you go to a cocktail party
filled with attorneys and elected city officials, the main question you are
likely to be asked about this research is: “Why is this kind of stuff
important?” The question really means:
“Why are you wasting time and money, maybe even tax money, on this kind of
activity, and why do you seem to be so interested in sex?”
There may be a thousand good
reasons why you are studying the sex life of obscure worms, but these reasons
probably involve the fundamental nature of science itself. The worms could, potentially, become a model
system for the study of hormone action at the cellular level, thus serving to
help explain developmental anomalies in humans, livestock, and companion
animals. The worms might be
extraordinarily beautiful creatures under the microscope, thus quite attractive
to students who in turn could easily become internationally renowned scholars
studying some global human affliction but who remember fondly their carefree
undergrad days back in the lab when all they had to talk about was worm
sex. The worms’ reproductive biology
could easily shed light on the origin of sex itself, or the evolution of
pheromones, both subjects of enormous interest to the scientific community. Pheromone action, as you might suspect, also
could be of substantial interest to the cosmetics industry. When a scientist hears that another scientist
is studying the sex life of obscure worms, then all of the possibilities
mentioned in this paragraph usually come to mind because scientists typically
understand how science itself works on a grand scale. Politicians, however, like their
constituencies, rarely get past the issues of time, money (especially tax
money), and sex, although sometimes, if not often, there is a hidden disdain
for people who would spend their lives studying microscopic creatures with no
immediate economic importance.
In our example of the worms,
politicians’ focus on time, money, sex, and utility is not necessarily stupid,
evil, or dangerous, although it has the potential for being all three. In the previous paragraph, I’ve actually
revealed all the reasons why in order to remain economically competitive in a
technologically competitive world, a nation needs to have a strong, healthy,
broad, and active scientific enterprise.
Flourishing scientific activity,
sustained largely by curiosity about the natural world, breeds scientists,
models, new ways of studying nature, and new applications of existing
technology. In other words, it is
the human resources that are of prime
importance to a highly developed nation, not the discoveries themselves. Given enough human resources engaged in
research, techniques for studying heretofore mysterious aspects of nature will
be developed and the discoveries will be made.
Furthermore, breadth of research interest tends to produce transferable
technologies, a critical factor in sustaining a technology-based economy.
INTELLIGENT DESIGNER is available as an e-book from kindle and smashwords.com, and as a paperback from createspace.com/3698485
Excerpt from CHRISTIAN ZOMBIE: A TALE OF SIN AND REDEMPTION
By this time there are sirens
winding down, red lights flashing out front, and a bunch of cops and
first-responder ambulance types charging through the front door. I don’t need
to tell you that this is one real mystery unfolding for anyone who wasn’t in Hair
of the Dog Saloon over the last hour. It’s almost like a stage play—bartender
doing what bartenders do, a guy (me) sitting at the end of the bar, a few
customers scattered around tables, bar girls taking some drinks out, kitchen
shoving a big plate of cheese fries up on the delivery shelf under the hot
lamps. And, of course, this disemboweled and dismembered carcass without a
face, drying blood and small intestines all over the floor, and that Glock
lying right there in the middle of it all. I won’t bore you with a detailed
description of the next hour at Hair
of the Dog, except to say that it involved a lot of interesting discussion.
Some time when he has a break, the bartender brings me my refill.
“We’re going out after closing,”
he says; “you’re welcome to join us.”
Of course I joined them. I’m not
sure there’s much literature on werewolf packs, so perhaps this unsavory time
of my life represents an opportunity to provide information to whomever might
need it in the future: law enforcement agencies, teen paranormal romance
writers, Hollywood wannabes, and anyone else who might have more than a passing
interest in extreme evil for the sake of evil. If you think one 230 pound, 6’
3”, beast with razor-sharp, two-inch canine teeth can wreak havoc, try a dozen
of these bad boys all hell-bent on complete destruction of anything and
everything in their path. The trouble is, there’s not much happening in Omaha
after 2:00AM and the last call for alcohol, so the pack has to go cruising for
24-hour places like certain pharmacies and grocery stores. My advice to the
average reader: don’t go to Heartland out on west Dodge after two in the
morning. In fact, even if you don’t live in Omaha, I recommend getting all your
normal business done before bar closing time. Yes, there are werewolf packs all
over the country, and probably throughout the world, too.
You’d think that high-ranking
elected officials, especially in the United States, would figure this out, but
in general they’re so stupid they can’t even understand evolution and global
climate change, so why would anyone expect them to appreciate the finer
attributes of a werewolf pack hiding right there under their noses? Anyone
wouldn’t, of course; the average person on the street still believes in angels
and that Barack Obama is not an American citizen, but come to think of it, such
individuals ought to be sitting ducks for a werewolf pack. I suspect there’s
some group dynamics at work here: it’s okay to believe that an American
President is not a citizen of this country because you get told that a thousand
times a day by some fat jerk with a cigar in his mouth spouting it out over our
common authority for all things, namely, television. So maybe if these kinds of
idiots started blaming your everyday problems on a pack of werewolves, then 56%
of the American public would come to believe it. Well, I’m here to tell you the
truth, that yes indeed, many of your common problems are, indeed, caused by a
pack of wolves.
Back in those days, before I
joined the pack, I honestly believed that the main function of a werewolf was
to instill terror in the human mind. What I discovered as a result of that
fateful evening in Hair of the Dog, was that there is a form of evil that goes
well beyond physical destruction. Trust me on this one: you see it almost every
day in the affairs of nations, the truly stupid conclusion based only on belief
(try “weapons of mass destruction” for starters, or if that hits too close to
your patriotic home, try “Let’s bundle these sub-prime mortgages and sell the
bundles as derivatives, then sell options on the derivatives.”) I will admit to
being a very naïve wolf in my solitary days. What I learned from the pack, and
especially the bartender—I’ll call him “Claude,” a very unlikely name for such
a role model—was that the words Shakespeare put into Mark Antony’s mouth were
right on target, and that if you really wanted to generate some evil that lives
after you, then you start by messing with the minds of those proverbial people
on the street. In other words, instead of killing them, you kill their ability
to think rationally.
The complete e-book, CHRISTIAN ZOMBIE: A TALE OF SIN AND REDEMPTION, is available on kindle and from smashwords.com.
Monday, April 1, 2013
Excerpt from DINKLE'S LIFE: A SPIRITUAL BIOGRAPHY
An excerpt from DINKLE'S LIFE: A SPIRITUAL BIOGRAPHY, a serious ghost story for our times:
“It
has rained most of the night,” continues Jimmy; “a cool damp soaking September
rain. Leaves are just starting to turn, and the few yellowish ones stand out
like wet signals in the green oaken forest. Lonnie Paul can smell the Earth as
he walks toward the open mound, picking his way through the harsh and tangled
blackjacks, green briar snapping at his cuffs. As he walks, a doe comes up
beside him, slipping silently through the brush until she is suddenly at his
side, within reach, tiptoeing over dead branches, through the litter. Her eyes
are large black wet marbles. Far off he hears blue jays calling, then closer,
until they’re overhead, jumping through the branches, softening their bell-like
notes. A small covey of quail runs ahead, taking many paths; the doe sidesteps
them nicely. The sun breaks through the clouds, casting a shaft of light on
bare earth, a spot where the day before he’d stopped digging. It had been too
dark to see exactly what he was doing, and his trowel had struck something hard.
I’m going to make a discovery today; he smiles at the doe. He swears she smiles
back.”
“With
his trowel in one hand, a brush in the other, he starts to uncover the object he’d
encountered the previous day. An unusual number of wild creatures seem to be
moving in the nearby woods, almost frolicking, he thinks, absolutely unafraid. The
doe lies down, folding her long legs. Titmice call—peter peter peter—then bounce nervously above his head, waiting, almost,
excited, happy . . . yes, happy, that was the word he wanted . . . happy. He
moves the soil away one grain at a time. His brush uncovers a bone, rounded, with
figures carved into its surface. A skull! At a deeper level than the flint! He
spends most of the day enlarging his trench in order to excavate around the head.
It is tedious work, for all flints pottery shards, basket pieces, implements, must
be numbered and recorded. He stops periodically to rest and make notes. Slight
movements reveal two dozen birds, a pair of squirrels, watching; rabbits, their
noses twitching regularly with their chewing of the fresh grass, waiting . . .
almost smiling. The doe is at peace.”
“By
late afternoon be has the top half of the skull excavated. The carved figures
are locked in a violent dance, a fire on the left temple, flames on the right.
Daylight fades, nearly into darkness before he lifts the entire skull free,
after centuries, from its earthen prison. He stares into the face; it smiles
back, an ancient, long gone, happy, almost entertaining, smile. It has been a
spectacular and fascinating day. Lonnie Paul is exhausted but the doe is wide
awake; night time is whitetail time. Rabbits nibble green twigs. The suns final
rays, coming in red and low from the west, make shadows on the underbrush. The
shadows move, a sylvan theatre of . . . of what? The weasel comes from nowhere
at the speed on light, hitting one of the rabbits with a heavy thump. Screams
pierce his ears, then more screams, screams that will not end. The doe sits
hypnotized, frozen. Then it’s over and as red shadows fade the air becomes
cool, and black. The skull crumbles in his hand, the lower jaw, facial features
falling in pieces on his feet, leaving only the cap with its twisting figures.
A great suction takes his breath, a giant suction, pulling up leaves, a whoosh
of air that he can hear careening through the valley, escaping into the
mountains to the south.”
“Then
it is silent and still. From far in the distance he hears Radiator yapping. He
puts the skullcap into his pack and starts for home, where Ma tells him what he’s
done.”
“What
had he done?” asks Monica, staring at Jimmy in a way that made him uncomfortable.
“He’d
let out the first of the North Sallisaw Burial Mound demons: the spirit of the fairy
tale, the God of Fiction.”
“That’s
stupid, Jimmy! What’s wrong with fairy tales?”
“Ask
those rabbits, Monica. They believed everything was okay, that everything was
going to be all right.”
DINKLE'S LIFE is available on kindle and smashwords.com. The demons that Lonnie Paul Dinkle released from the North Sallisaw Mound are still with us.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Excerpt from OUTWITTING COLLEGE PROFESSORS
The essay test (either long or short answer):
(1) Work on your penmanship. Practice writing legibly. You
may be perfectly capable of reading your own handwriting, but that remarkable
skill doesn’t mean that anyone else can read it. Poor handwriting is probably
the source of more lost points on essay exams than any other factor. Profs just
get sick and tired of trying to decipher scrawl. Often, however, if you’ve
answered the first question well, they’ll skip through the later scrawl and
give you the benefit of the doubt. But don’t count on this lucky event
happening; the first question might be the one you know least about, and in
that case, the scrawl-skipping will work to your distinct disadvantage.
As a rule of thumb, some perfect
stranger should be able to read your handwriting as easily as he or she reads a
printed page. Always (always!) use dark ink—black or dark blue—or if a pencil
is required, a dark and sharpened lead. Your letters should be large enough to
read at arm’s length. Never trust a college prof to have eagle-eye vision (or
an owl’s hearing, either), especially if he or she is over the age of 50.
(2) Work on your grammar.
Whatever you do, do not make any of the truly common mistakes made by
college students (see also the next chapter on papers). The truly common mistakes are:
a. Using “it’s” when you
actually mean “its” or vice versa.
b. Using “alot” when you
actually mean “a lot”.
c. Using “there” when you
actually mean “their” or vice versa.
d. Using the wrong verb form. If
you were born in the United States, for example, there is no excuse for using
“went” when you mean “gone” either in writing or in speech.
e. Using the incorrect possessive
form of any word, for example “cars” when you actually mean “car’s.”
This list could be much longer,
but I believe you get the drift. Poor grammar will hurt you not only on the
next exam, but also on the next job interview, the next potential promotion,
and the next time you have to accomplish some real business in the real world,
whatever that business might be, including contracts, agreements involving
money, pre-nuptial agreements, divorce proceedings, complaints to a school
board about how your child is being taught, you name it. Use correct grammar.
Alternatively, change your name to one that sounds exceedingly foreign so that
the person reading your writing believes that English is your second language
and you’ve just started learning it. Then you’ll be admired instead of
ridiculed.
(3) Practice writing in complete sentences. Failure to write in
complete sentences is probably the second most common source of lost points on
essay exams mainly because such failure suggests to a grader that you are not
well educated and thus don’t know much about anything, including the subject
over which you’re being tested. You may also have been told to write in
complete sentences, so read the directions and follow them before you start
your essay. If you can easily generate sentences that are grammatically correct
and at least 15 words long, then you have taken a major step toward getting
better grades on all essay exams no matter what the subject.
(4) Practice writing short paragraphs in which there is both an idea
and a fact to support the idea. This essay technique is usually difficult
for students to learn, but it’s the technique that profs use all the time in
their own work. So if you can master it, then you’ve made some major progress
toward actually getting better grades, especially if you combine this technique
with the above advice. Beyond these four behaviors, only true knowledge and
understanding of the subject matter stands between you and better grades. Now
for the most difficult of all exams:
The multiple choice test:
OUTWITTING COLLEGE PROFESSORS, 4th Edition, is available from createspace.com and on both kindle and smashwords.com. This little book makes a terrific graduation present for any high school senior headed to college.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)